Chinese Cash That Powered Silicon Valley Is Suddenly Toxic
As U.S. startups reject their money, Chinese venture-capital firms in U.S. are dialing back investments, structuring deals to avoid regulators or shutting down
From: Wall Street Journal
Silicon Valley startup Pilot AI Labs Inc. signed a Chinese-backed venturecapital ﬁrm as its ﬁrst big investor in 2015. By last summer, Pilot AI wanted it gone.
The U.S. startup hoped to sell more of its artiﬁcial-intelligence software to the U.S. government after working with the Pentagon, according to people familiar with its operations, and worried its eﬀort could be hurt by the investor’s ties to China’s government. The chairman of the Chinese-backed investor, Digital Horizon Capital, was asked to sell back its stake, said one of the people. He angrily refused.
Chinese investors were once embraced in Silicon Valley both for their pocketbooks and their access to one of the world’s largest and trickiest markets. Today, they are suddenly less welcome.
Since late last year, amid rising U.S.-China tensions, venture ﬁrms with China ties have been dialing back their U.S. investments, structuring deals in novel ways to avoid regulators or shutting their U.S. oﬃces. Some American venture ﬁrms are dumping their Chinese limited partners or walling them oﬀ with special structures. And some U.S. startups that have taken signiﬁcant Chinese money are keeping the investments quiet or trying to push their Chinese investors out to avoid scrutiny.
After hitting record levels early last year, Chinese funding for U.S. startups slowed beginning in May 2018, according to research ﬁrm Rhodium Group. And state-backed Chinese investors all but disappeared by year-end, Rhodium said. Meanwhile, foreign direct investment from China, which includes acquisitions of U.S. companies, plunged 90% to $5 billion in 2018 from $46 billion in 2016.
Behind the shift in sentiment is an eﬀort by the U.S. government to stem a talent and technology outﬂow it fears could threaten American economic and military superiority. Some Chinese investors hoped a trade deal would be struck in April, easing tensions and reopening the path to investments, but instead the trade ﬁght has spiraled into higher tariﬀs. Some American venture investors say Washington is overreacting and threatening the beneﬁts that come from open trade with China, cutting oﬀ startups’ access to a lucrative market and source of capital. Two venture ﬁrms with China operations have complained to a Defense Department unit of being unfairly singled out, a sign of the gap in how the two sides assess the threat.
Many Washington policy makers don’t understand technology, and many technology executives don’t understand great power politics, said Amy Zegart, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, a conservative think tank.
The U.S. government’s pressure campaign gained momentum last fall when a new law increased the power of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., or Cﬁus, to require international investors to get approval for technology deals. The change restricts investments in companies working with more sensitive technologies and adds red tape that makes foreign investment less attractive to U.S. startups.
Around the same time, a group of senators and Trump administration oﬃcials began holding private meetings with Silicon Valley companies and investors to warn of the risks of doing business with China.
The administration criticized China’s eﬀorts to obtain U.S. technology in a November report describing how Chinese venture ﬁrms with state ties could gain access to intellectual property from U.S. startups. The report from the U.S. Trade Representative called out Digital Horizon—the Chinalinked investor in Pilot AI—saying it aimed to help guide U.S. technologies back to Beijing.
Digital Horizon, formerly called Danhua Capital, is backed by multiple Chinese investors, among them the investment arm of state-owned Zhongguancun Development Group.
Digital Horizon has been one of the most active Chinese-funded venture ﬁrms in Silicon Valley, raising roughly $500 million in capital and investing in scores of U.S. startups, alongside major U.S. venture ﬁrms. In 2015, at a time when American startups gladly took Chinese capital, Digital Horizon led a roughly $500,000 investment in Pilot AI, becoming its ﬁrst institutional investor, according to research ﬁrm Pitchbook.
By the middle of last year, the mood had changed dramatically, with President Trump implementing tariﬀs on Chinese-made products and Congress moving to beef up Cﬁus’s power to review more deals. With hopes of securing more government business, Palo Alto, Calif.,-based Pilot AI last summer decided it would be prudent for Digital Horizon to unload its stake. That was when Digital Horizon’s chairman was asked to sell it back, according to the person familiar with the incident, who said the chairman, Shoucheng Zhang, was angered at what he felt was pressure to sell.
Dr. Zhang, who was also a physics professor at Stanford University, died on Dec. 1, in what the San Francisco medical examiner’s oﬃce called an apparent suicide. It cited “an apparent note of intent” that referenced depression.
A spokesman for Digital Horizon said it had no knowledge of a request that the ﬁrm unload its stake in Pilot AI, which it still holds.
One Digital Horizon backer, the Beijing tech hub Zhongguancun, removed Chinese-language signs from its outpost in Santa Clara, Calif., and took down a Chinese ﬂag out front.
Asked about the signage, Ella Li, head of investment in Santa Clara for Zhongguancun Capital, said it wanted to keep a low proﬁle after a U.S. government report. The U.S. Trade Representative’s November report described Zhongguancun, which is commonly known as ZGC, as a Chinese government-backed entity aiming to divert U.S. technology and talent.
A ZGC spokeswoman wrote in a statement: “We believe that there exist some gaps for business transactions across the Paciﬁc, and we hope to bridge the gaps through our eﬀorts in operating the incubator space in the Bay Area.”
Another Beijing-based investor, Sinovation Ventures, has shut its oﬃce in Palo Alto and stopped investing from the U.S., said people familiar with the ﬁrm, whose chairman, Kai-Fu Lee, is a leading AI expert and former Google and Microsoft executive. Sinovation had made 46 investments in the U.S., according to its website.
A Sinovation spokeswoman said the ﬁrm is “re-evaluating its U.S. strategy” after key personnel departures led to reduced U.S. investments. Its change of investing plans was earlier reported by Vox.
David Cao, who helped build a networking and events business introducing Chinese investors to U.S. startups, has found the number of Chinese ﬁrms actively investing in U.S. startups signiﬁcantly decreased. Few Chinese investors attended a conference Mr. Cao held in April. “It’s harder to connect people,” he said.
Making things harder is the point, say U.S. policy makers.
Since October, Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia and Republican colleagues on the Senate Intelligence Committee have been holding brieﬁngs for U.S. venture capitalists, tech executives, other business leaders and university administrators, urging them to take the threat of Chinese intellectual-property theft more seriously and to reduce dealings with their Chinese counterparts.
The meetings, featuring presentations from top oﬃcials of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Homeland Security and National Counterintelligence and Security Center, are closed to the public so classiﬁed material can be shared. Some attendees—people who have come to rely on China for business and funding—have pressed the government for hard evidence of the threat, according to U.S. oﬃcials familiar with the meetings.
Mr. Warner, a former venture capitalist, says he historically supported expanding economic ties with China. “But a few years and many, many classiﬁed brieﬁngs later, my views have changed, as the government in China has,” Mr. Warner said in a written statement. “While many people in Washington understand the gravity of the threat, that’s not true across the country.”
The FBI has also beefed up eﬀorts to warn companies about the threat of Chinese intellectual-property theft, building up a squad of about a dozen agents and analysts in its San Francisco oﬃce—more than other FBI oﬃces have—to work with companies. It recently published a report titled “Protect Your Startup" with tops for acoiding intellectural property theft.
The FBI oﬃce has conducted hundreds of brieﬁngs for companies on cybersecurity threats and economic espionage. It discourages people from using their regular smartphones and laptops when traveling in China and warns male U.S. executives to avoid “honeypot” espionage attempts by attractive women. “If you’re not a 10 in the U.S., you’re not a 10 in China,” oﬃcials say they’ve told the executives.
One venture capitalist who received such a brieﬁng said his ﬁrm is excluding its sole Chinese investor from future fundraising to avoid holding up any deals that could require approval from Cﬁus.
Baidu Ventures, a venture-capital ﬁrm mostly funded by the prominent Chinese search-engine company Baidu Inc., has altered the structure of some of its investments to avoid Cﬁus scrutiny, said Saman Farid, a partner at the ﬁrm.
When Baidu Ventures sees a company it likes, it sometimes recruits another investor to lead the deal and signs over its voting rights to that other investor, while not taking a board seat or asking to see company information, Mr. Farid said.
Chinese conglomerate Fosun International now is avoiding U.S. investments in sensitive industries because of a “less-friendly environment,” said Mike Xu, managing director of its Fosun Capital unit.
The venture arm of Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is shifting to investments outside the U.S., according to two people familiar with its operations.
Alibaba was already taking care to avoid regulators’ gaze. When it invested last summer in DeepMap Inc., a Palo Alto startup working on advanced mapping technology for self-driving cars, Alibaba bought around 7% of the company, a percentage that would have helped avoid a Cﬁus review of the deal.
After DeepMap raised a new funding round last summer, it disclosed some of its new investors, though not Alibaba, even though Alibaba had invested the most. A DeepMap spokeswoman said Alibaba had asked not to be cited.
An Alibaba spokesman declined to comment.
DeepMap co-founder and CEO James Wu said his company doesn’t disclose some of its Chinese investors. “We don’t want to make a big noise,” he said.
Part of the fall-oﬀ in Chinese investment is due to China’s eﬀorts to restrict capital outﬂows in order to protect the value of the yuan. Naval Ravikant, co-founder of the AngelList funding network, said Chinese investment ﬁrm CSC Venture Capital agreed in 2015 to invest $400 million in startups listed on AngelList and discussed raising the amount to $1 billion. It had invested only about $100 million before Chinese capital controls eﬀectively ended the deal in 2017, said Mr. Ravikant.
Some Chinese investors and ethnically Chinese U.S. citizens say they are confused by the aggressive approach of the U.S. government, contending that making connections in other countries is often a way venture capitalists help startups.
A January 2018 report by a Defense Department unit warned that China’s government could gain access to “the crown jewels of U.S. innovation” through investments in U.S. startups. The report listed seven “Chinese venture ﬁrms” without making speciﬁc accusations that any of them engaged in problematic diversion of U.S. technology.
Richard Lim, a managing director with GSR Ventures, said his ﬁrm wasn’t contacted before its name was included in the report from the Defense Innovation Unit, or DIU. He said it was wrong to call his ﬁrm a Chinese fund because most of its capital comes from U.S.-based limited partners and less than 10% from Chinese investors.
The DIU report didn’t mention some U.S. venture ﬁrms that have signiﬁcant operations in China, notably Sequoia Capital. Neil Shen, who is the head of Sequoia’s China operation—and one of the most prominent venture capitalists globally—is part of a body called the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference that advises China’s legislature.
A Sequoia spokeswoman declined to comment.
Another ﬁrm DIU listed, GGV Capital, protested its inclusion in a March letter to DIU reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. A spokeswoman said DIU hasn’t replied to the letter from her ﬁrm, which has oﬃces in Silicon Valley, China and Singapore. DIU didn’t respond to a question about GGV’s complaint.
Sinovation was also mentioned in the report and complained to DIU last June. A person familiar with the report said that after the complaint, DIU consulted with researchers that found additional ties between Sinovation and the Chinese government. This person said ﬁrms named in the report weren’t contacted ahead of time.
Michael Brown, director of DIU and one of the report’s authors, said it was written to raise awareness among U.S. government and industry oﬃcials about the extent of Chinese investments in early-stage ﬁrms “and how these investments ﬁt into a long-running and broader technology transfer strategy that beneﬁts from both legal and illegal means.”